There are so many valuable things to do with Visual Patterns. I really appreciate your comments, as they’re getting my wheels to turn about what else I can bring into my classroom.
I hope this is the first of many conversations! Thanks again for sharing your thoughts. 🙂
Take care,
]]>Nice graphic on the quadratic example. Thanks for sharing. I have used these successfully this way too.
You probably have already done what I will share next, something I picked up from LTLF. One of the things that Branca and Mumme and Seago suggested, was to make the table have 3 columns, one in the center for the “Indicated Arithmetic”. I sometimes change that language in the heading for kids (“show you work”, or “computation”), but the idea is to have them write an arithmetic expression for how they can count the number of circles in the figure (without just counting each one by one), and then for them to use a common method of determining the number of circles in each figure resulting in similar expressions.
It is a bit hard to explain here. I’ll refer you to a document
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/2sjwxm1t3w2i3ms/Linear_Growth_Practicum%20Deb%20Revised%202.28.2015.doc?dl=0)
that was created for teachers who, after doing some face-to-face pd, were going to team teach a lesson for students. It may make it clearer. If you have done something similar I would love to hear about it. I find this extra column useful for supporting students in moving to the algebraic, or to support those recursive thinkers (seeing the adding on pattern) to moving to an explicit function (seeing that multiplication can be used as well.) As I read a bit of Fawn’s website, I believe she noticed that delaying when they write the differences on the tables helps with that too.
Thanks for the conversation!
]]>I’m not familiar with the resource you mentioned. It sounds like a great resource, though I like the price tag of Fawn’s website better than this: http://amzn.com/0325006822
My introduction to these sorts of patterns (and extending them, then developing rules for them) began with a series of activities from the AIMS Education Foundation while studying the Grad Math program at Fresno Pacific University. I fell in love with figurate numbers there…
We definitely move into quadratics. I suppose you could explore additional function types, though I feel the geometric/area connections that can be made with linear and quadratic visual patterns are the most enjoyable. In fact, we just had a conversation about this on Twitter last night! Here’s a link: https://twitter.com/mjfenton/status/571458522501799937 (The comments I’m referring to arose during a chat with @reilly1041.)
We usually discuss the geometric connection/interpretation in class, but it’s something I decided not to highlight in this post.
Here’s a small set of images suggesting how such a quadratic discussion might play out in class or in a workshop: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jdutmsd9fh4nzqt/AABWwuHLFoCFmdBNZZ54a_eja?dl=0
Thanks again for stopping by! Looking forward to more comments in the future. 🙂
]]>I wonder if you had some students make some visual connections. In your post above, I can see a way that students can visually see when the function is y = 3x + 2. One might ask, “Where is each part of that equation in the picture? Where is the 2 for example?” They can find where there are 2 circles, and notice that there is a way to see the 2 circles in each succeeding stage, that they are constantly there (pun intended), and they can also see that there is a 3 by x rectangular array of circles, and that the width of that array is increasing (hence that dimension changes and varies).
Thank you for sharing your thoughts about having students draw the sequence for themselves, and then how you have them draw the next stage, and then leap to 10, make a table and a graph. Desmos looks like a great tool–I’ll check that out.
Do you do this for quadratic functions too?
]]>There are some videos on the nrich site here
http://nrich.maths.org/8111
which I think are nice because they show students that there is more than one way of skinning a cat (sorry – English expression, hope that translates OK!)