A couple years ago, I sat against the wall in my sons’ bedroom, taking screenshots of my smartphone once every four minutes for an entire evening. (Why, you ask? For math!)
The result: Charge! (quite likely my only decent entry into the world of three act tasks).
About a year ago, I created an Activity Builder version of the task. And I’ve never been satisfied with it.
I think it’s better than nothing at all, but undeniably worse than the slide-driven, conversation-rich, paper-and-pencil version I posted on my blog a while back.
When it comes to the Desmos activity building code, this activity—even in its AB-powered form—succeeds on several fronts, including “create problematic activities” and “connect representations” (among others).
However, it struggles in ways that overshadow its strengths. Most notably:
#5 – Give students opportunities to be right and wrong in different, interesting ways. The AB version of Charge! feels too scripted. Too narrow. Rather uninteresting. “Do this. Now this. Next, this. Now do this.” And so on, all the way through the activity. There’s really just one path, and the activity leads students along it with minimal opportunity (or even need) for careful reflection or critical thought.
#8 – Create objects that promote mathematical conversations between teachers and students. This is a tricky one. I believe the activity could generate classroom discussion, but that the sheer number of screens works against that possibility, rather than in support of it. Let’s assume a 50-minute class period, with 45-minutes dedicated to this activity. That’s just 2.5 minutes per screen, which isn’t terribly conducive to classroom discussions. It might be wise to trim the number of screens so that there’s room for deeper discussions on a smaller set of screens.
#13 – Ask proxy questions. Would I recommend this activity? Nope. Not in its current form. I’d be much more comfortable recommending the original slide-based version. With the activity parsed into 18 step-by-step style screens, there’s no one screen with anything really interesting happening on it. One of my colleagues likes to consider the quality of an activity by asking whether any of the work students do on a given screen could be considered fridge-worthy. In other words, if they could print it out and take it home to show mom and dad, would it end up on the fridge as a proud display of something deep or delightful? Again, because I’ve chopped the interesting work in Charge! into 18 tiny bits, the answer is no. Nothing fridge-worthy in this approach.
Drop a line (or two) in the comments, or let me know what you think on Twitter (@mjfenton).
I’ll be back Friday with a new treatment of my own.
Cheers!
]]>Model 3 design sketches pic.twitter.com/P5ucOBRUZ7
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 3, 2016
With a little help from Skitch, let’s turn this scenario into a math problem.
Throw that image on the screen and ask students:
Ideally, after making some predictions (and writing them down!) students make a request for average price per vehicle, and you deliver:
When they’re ready for the reveal…
Model 3 orders at 180,000 in 24 hours. Selling price w avg option mix prob $42k, so ~$7.5B in a day. Future of electric cars looking bright!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2016
Let’s see what else we can do with this…
Definitely going to need to rethink production planning…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2016
Now 232k orders
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 2, 2016
253k as of 7am this morning
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 2, 2016
276k Model 3 orders by end of Sat
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 3, 2016
Pre orders began on Thursday, March 31. Tesla promised a numbers update on Wednesday, April 6. How many pre orders do you think will have been placed by then?
I’ll drop an update here once we know the answer.
Over 325k cars or ~$14B in preorders in first week. Only 5% ordered max of two, suggesting low levels of speculation.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 7, 2016
Tesla aims to sell 500,000 cars per year by 2020. Consider this comment from CEO Elon Musk:
Based on the information in the comment above:
Drop an answer to one of the questions above in the comments below. Or, share another idea or two for how this Model 3 craze could play out in a math classroom.
]]>I don’t know why, but there’s something about that noise (in a math problem, no less) that simultaneous makes me giggle and fires up the I-need-to-know-what-was-said corner of my brain.
So I made this:
Since I made the video ((For the record, that was two months ago. This post has been sitting in draft purgatory for long enough. So it’s time to drop this in the urgent bin and get it out the door.)) a few things have happened in the world of college basketball.
At any rate, I’m not entirely satisfied with the result. I mean, I was really hopeful UCLA could make it to the Elite Eight I could turn this into an engaging lesson hook, but the first group I tried this on kind of just stared at the screen after the Act 1 video ended.
So I’d love some feedback, either in general, or in response to some of these:
Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
P.S. If you’re interested in a link to Act 1 and Act 3, you’re welcome. And here’s a notebook full of some links and images I gathered but never used.
]]>